Send Your CALL or Congress to fasticongressuum@gmail.com

CALL. 21.12.2018: Mothering(s) and Religions: Normative Perspectives and Individual Appropriations. A Cross-Cultural and Interdisciplinary Approach from Antiquity to the Present - Erfurt (Germany)

04.12.2018

 

go to CONGRESS 

 

This workshop is the third in a cycle entitled Religionification of Motherhood and Mothers’  Appropriation of Religion. The first one,  Breastfeeding(s) and Religions: Normative Prescriptionsand Individual Appropriation. A Cross-Cultural and Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Antiquityto the Present, was held at the Max-Weber-Kolleg (University of Erfurt) on July 11-12, 2018. Thesecond one, Pregnancies, Childbirths, and Religions: Rituals, Normative Perspectives, and Individual Appropriations. A Cross-Cultural and Interdisciplinary Perspective from Antiquity to the Present will take place at the Max-Weber-Kolleg (University of Erfurt), January 31- February1,2019.

 

FECHA LÍMITE/DEADLINE/SCADENZA: 21/12/2018

 

FECHA CONGRESO/CONGRESS DATE/DATA CONGRESSO: 16-17/07/2019

 

LUGAR/LOCATION/LUOGO: Max-Weber-Kolleg, University of Erfurt (Erfurt, Germany)


ORGANIZADOR/ORGANIZER/ORGANIZZATORE: Dr. Giulia Pedrucci; Dr. Emiliano Urciuoli

 

INFO: PDF - giulia.pedrucci@gmail.com ; giulia.pedrucci@uni-erfurt.de

 

CALL: 

In this third and final workshop we will focus particularly on the religious roles of the “mother” in the child’s life after the perinatal phase and until adulthood, as well as on the less fortunate cases in which the offspring dies before becoming adult. In this regard, the distinction made by Susan Starr. Sered (1994)  between “womAn as symbol” (e.g., images of goddesses  and normative stereotypes created by male religious authorities) and “womEn as agents” (real practice, historical mothers), and the distinction made by Adrienne Rich (1976) between “Motherhood as institution” and "Motherhood as experience” (women’s experience of and relation to her own reproductivecapacities) are particularly relevant here. In fact, evidence suggests a widespread gap betweennormative representation and actual practice. While the first two workshops dealt with physiological functions that only a woman –  mother-to-be or newly mother –  can perform, this third workshop stresses that the rearing of a child shifts the focus from biology to society. Therefore, it is necessary to define what “mother” is. In order to do so, we use Sara Ruddick’s articulation of the three demands of maternal thinking ––  preservation, growth, and social acceptance  ––   that are met by the three practices of preservative love, nurturance, and training (Ruddick 1989:17). Preservation has to be understood as the most compelling demand. As Ruddick suggests, “mother” is better understood as a verb (to mother) rather than as a feminine substantive. A "mother” is anyone who engages in maternal practice and makes this a central part of their life. Mother can, thus, be gender-inclusive.Inspired by Ruddick’s words, the epistemological framework and definition of “mother”  that wesuggest for this workshop reads as follows: any child can have in their life one or more figures whocollaborate (simultaneously or not) in pursuing preservation, growth, and social acceptance, butusually every child has in their life a figure  – a “mother” –  who takes care of them on a daily  – oral most daily  –   base in order to pursue their preservation, growth, and social acceptance. Significant others can help this figure, but she/he performs this task in a preponderant way in comparison with others. This figure is often, but not always and not necessarily, the biological mother. As the titleaims to underline, there is a multiplicity of ways to mother, some of which can be shaped andinfluenced by religion or by other social forces similar to religion. These will form the focus of theworkshop. Examples include “spiritual mothering,” collective mothering of children by religious institutions, as well as redefinition, negation or negotiation of parenting patterns for instancereligious or pseudo-religious inside sects (Mount Athos, Il Forteto…).

 

We invite papers exploring case studies within the theoretical framework outlined above concerningreligious prescriptions for "mothers” and their roles as primary religious inculturators, healers,nurturers, trainers, primary child care providers, active agents in case of lifecycle rituals, as well as in case of the offspring’s death  and the preservation of its soul and body, and emotional supportersfor other mothers in cases of childhood diseases and premature death. We also welcome case studies in which mothers’ response to religious norms can be traced back, and those who clarify to which extent mothers feel free to transgress without blaming themselves for not being a “good” mother and obedient member of a specific religious tradition. Moreover, we welcome case studieswhere the religious usage of space is influenced by the fact that activities are performed specifically by mothers for themselves or for their offspring.A specific section will be dedicated to the figures we label as “transgressive mothers.”  We are looking for cases in which “mothers” kill, do not properly feed children, or educate them to self-destructive behaviors on the basis of religious reasons. Examples include Medea, whose actions seems constantly dictated by the Sun God, jihadist “mothers”, “mothers”  during the Jonestown massacre, “mothers” who refuses life-saving medical treatments for their offspring, includingvaccines, etc. We will ask why these mothering figures use religion or spirituality as a way to notconform to the expectations of motherhood, by missing the first, most important demand: preservation/preservative love. 

 

For this reason, they act against the definition itself of “mother” and  become “transgressive.” Quite interestingly, this transgressive behavior based on religious or pseudo-religious beliefs, usually implies a spatial separation from the urban space and its social andemotional pressures and networks (just to make some examples, Medea kills outside the city wall, Jonestown perfectly reproduces a town but in the jungle, Il Forteto is located in the countryside like all the communities at the time of the time).

 

We welcome case studies which deepen ourunderstanding of these socio-cultural dynamics.The workshop will be held in English. The proposals, which should not exceed 300 words, must be received by December 21, 2018. Please, send them to Dr. Giulia Pedrucci (giulia.pedrucci@gmail.com or  giulia.pedrucci@uni-erfurt.de)

 

Please reload

categorías / tags / categorie

Please reload

Fasti Congressuum is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional License
© 2014 by Fasti Congressuum. Proudly created by M. Cristina de la Escosura